Free Trade Agreement Or Customs Union

But to remain in the internal market, countries must allow the free movement of goods, services, capital and people. This last point means that immigration is difficult, if not impossible, to control – although the UK can get a specific agreement to allow certain borders. Nevertheless, the UK could opt for an exit from the single market, but remain in the customs union, but that means it could not negotiate free trade agreements with other countries, that is what the EU is doing. If we left both the internal market and the customs union, we could negotiate a free trade agreement with the EU. A free trade area is an area in which there are no tariffs or taxes or quotas for goods and/or services from a country entering another country. As a multilateral trade agreement, GATT calls on its members to extend the status of the Most Preferred Nation (MFN) to other GATT trading partners. MFN status means that each GATT member enjoys the same tariff treatment of its products in foreign markets as the “most favoured” country that competes in the same market, thus excluding the preferences or discrimination of a Member State. Since the beginning of the GATT, the average tariffs set by Member States have increased from about 40% shortly after the Second World War to around 5% today. These tariff reductions helped to stimulate both the strong expansion of world trade after the Second World War and the resulting increase in real per capita income between developed and developing countries. The benefit of the elimination of tariff and non-tariff barriers following the Tokyo round (1973-1979) of the GATT negotiations was estimated at more than 3% of global GDP. The second way of looking at free trade agreements as public goods is related to the growing trend that they are “deeper”. The depth of a free trade agreement relates to the additional types of structural policies it covers.

While older trade agreements are considered more “flat” because they cover fewer areas (for example. B tariffs and quotas), recent agreements cover a number of other areas, ranging from e-commerce services and data relocation. Since transactions between parties to a free trade agreement are relatively cheaper than those with non-parties, free trade agreements are considered excluded. Now that deep trade agreements will improve the harmonization of legislation and increase trade flows with non-parties, thereby reducing the exclusivity of free trade agreements, next-generation free trade agreements will take on essential characteristics for public goods. [19] Figure 2 provides a simplified blueprint for a free trade agreement. In a free trade agreement, the two countries A and B do not apply tariffs to each other, but unlike a customs union, country A applies a 5% tariff to third countries, while country B imposes 15% and there is no common tariff. In this case, if a product imported into Country A under a 5% tariff was transported to County B, the product would be subject to a 5% tariff and not the 15% tariff of Land B, which would result in goods transiting through Country A being subject to a tariff of less than 5%. In order to avoid this circumvention, a free trade agreement generally establishes the rules of origin to demonstrate that the products actually come from country A.

Comments are closed.